Showing posts with label digital. Show all posts
Showing posts with label digital. Show all posts

Wednesday, 21 January 2009

wrong, wrong, right!

nearly caught up with writing up sessions now!

this one (wrong, wrong, right! creating an academic digital storytelling program that works) was ace, and looked at a program at ohio state. they started off by sharing a digital story that a lecturer had created - which was a great way of getting people hooked in to the power of the medium.

they've had a digital storytelling program in operation for a while, and the focus of the session was on 6 revisions they've made to make it more successful. the 6 elements are:


  • development of a 3-day intensive workshop
  • a scriptwriting pre-workshop activity
  • shift from personal stories to academic-focussed [pretty much a move from academics making stories, to academic stories created by academic and non-academic staff]
  • outreach to new 'unexpected' participants [including those staff who have completed the course helping their colleagues to develop skills]
  • application process [interested staff have to submit their ideas and give an idea of what they hope to achieve
  • screenings of completed stories a couple of weeks after the course had finished

you can look at additional resources and examples of the stories here.

a few things (possibly) worth highlighting from the session:

  • students from multimedia courses help with hands on teaching of techniques
  • during the workshop, they maintain a check list of tasks - tracking activities that individual have completed, and still need to complete
  • the selectivity/application process helps participants focus on their reasons for applying - eg, what story would you like to share?
  • they set a 400 word limit for the summary of the story - one key point of the course is how to use images, sounds, etc, to convey meaning rather than relying on text
  • academics are using the resources for teaching and learning as well as dissemination of research
  • after couple of weeks break to allow fine tuning of the stories they hold a screening to show the end products - and they usually get 50/60 people attending to find out more

they did (rather cruelly) make us think during the session, and asked us to talk about existing groups on-campus who might find digital stories a useful way of sharing information. i thought maybe something like the integrated e-learning course would be interesting - so to embed some similar techniques into an extended version of the course, and get participants to tell stories about the things that have inspired them (if that's not too strong a word) to revisit their curriculum and/or take the course in the first place.

any more for any more?

michael wesch keynote

you can see the recording of this session (and other featured sessions) here - if you get chance, i'd recommend checking it out. most of you will probably be familiar with the videos from his cultural ethnography students - even so, if you haven't heard him talk before, it's nice to hear his own spin on the way things have developed, and the fact that he seems to be quite overwhelmed by all the attendion. also, check out the digital ethnography netvibes page for a sense of the dynamics and busy-ness of what's going on in his classes.

one of the things i find interesting about this conference is how there are lots of parallels between individual sessions - but that in the majority of cases, they're presented with enough of a spin on them, and with enough substance behind them, that it doesn't get boring or cliched (yet!). for example the idea that media literacy is as much about instilling a sense of social responsibility as it is about giving students the skills to use new tools and technologies has been quite strong in some sessions, and this one was no exception.

there are also some interesting comparisons between the current 'revolution' in education and the changes in the 1960s; and a look at how current criticisms of teaching new media literacy (it's pandering to students, abandoning traditional literacy, difficult to implement) can also be turned around as criticisms of the 'back to basics' movement.

well worth checking out, anyway.